Today is Veterans Day in the U.S. (November 11, 2013). Here is my arrangement of the fight songs of the U.S. Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard, performed by the Trinity Jazz Orchestra.
Category: Composition/Theory
Introducing Improvisation in the Concert Band Setting
Ever since the National Association for Music Education adopted its National Standards for Music Education one area that band directors have begun to address in more detail than ever before is improvisation. NAfME’s standards include:
Improvising melodies, variations, and accompaniments.
In many band programs, however, this can be a real challenge for directors to implement, particularly if he or she has had little to no experience playing jazz. If you don’t happen to play one of the typical jazz instruments the chances that you feel uncomfortable are high. This essay is designed for band directors who want to introduce improvisation with their students in the concert band specifically, although music teachers should be able to find ways to adapt these ideas for almost any situation with a little thought and creativity.
The first thing to understand is that everyone improvises all the time, but we often don’t think about it when it happens because we’re so used to it. When rehearsing our concert band we improvise a great deal by responding to what we’re hearing and addressing them in patterns that we know (or hope) will be successful. As we get more experience teachings we pick up on new ideas and try them out, eventually coming up with our own teaching style that fits our own personality and style. This process isn’t really all that different from how we can develop an improvisational style, it’s just a different context.
The way we teach is highly influenced by those who taught us. Improvisation should be equally influenced by an informed opinion of what we think works and fits how we want to play. In order to improvise convincingly we should be familiar with lots of different players. Probably the most important thing that we as band directors can do is listen to lots of great improvisers and encourage our students to listen to great improvisers as well. It’s sort of like learning to speak a language from reading a book. You can learn the “grammar” and “spelling” of musical improvisation from a book, but if you don’t listen to it performed by the masters you’re going to end up with a funny “accent.”
Improvising for the first time can be a daunting task. There are lots of different things to keep track of all at once and the amount of multitasking is intimidating for many students. That said, when you consider improvisation at its basic level there are really three main areas of concern – when to play, what to play, and how to play it.
When to play is usually the first thing I address with teaching improvisation to a new group of students in a longer-term improvisation class. Subtopics in this area of concern include using silence, playing with good phrasing, rhythmic density, etc. The main point I want to get across at first is that you don’t have to play all the time and, in fact, it’s often more interesting to leave room in your improvisations for your audience to guess what’s coming next. I like to demonstrate to new students what this can be like by improvising a solo by using much more silence than I normally would. When a soloist doesn’t play for a long time the tension can really build up and no matter what you play next the release can be quite surprising and enjoyable. Get your students to duplicate this in their own solos as much as possible.
Leaving silence in improvisations has additional benefits beyond simply making your solos more interesting. It allows the accompanists to interact more conversationally. It also gives the student a chance to evaluate what he or she just played and how effective it was and then think about what’s coming up next. This is also another one of NAfME’s standards.
Evaluating music and music performances.
Items that address what to play are actually pretty easy to find. This includes things like chord/scale relationships, playing chord tones and non-chord tones, playing outside the changes, etc. There are lots of great resources all over on this aspect of improvisation, so rather than duplicate a lot of it here I’ll instead focus on what I think the best way to teach this element of improvisation is.
Music is an aural art form. It exists in sound, not on the paper. With improvisation it is even more important to learn to listen and imitate the sounds you hear. When introducing note choices to students new to improvisation I always teach them by playing a pitch and having them find it on their instrument by ear.
A simple ear training exercise you can do with your concert band is to play random notes and have your students try to match pitch. Some students will be better than others and it’s helpful for struggling students to have a strategy to help them out. I usually advice my students to simply play a chromatic scale until they hear themselves match the pitch. Over time they will find it easier to hear when they’ve found the right pitch and may even begin finding it faster by learning how far away they are and leaping closer to the correct pitch. Once students get used to matching pitch with you playing the lead have a student volunteer play the random pitches instead.
As an aside, I find many students will use their eyes, rather than their ears, to figure out the pitch. As a trombonist I get in the habit of playing lots of pitches with alternate positions to see if the trombone section is just watching my slide rather than finding pitches by ear. Students will often look over to their section peers to look at fingerings rather than risk guessing the wrong pitch. It’s up to you to encourage them to avoid this and instead really try to find pitches by ear. The payoff will be much better in the long run if they can learn to find pitches aurally, rather than visually. Once most of the class has found the pitch I will tell the band what the pitch is to help provide feedback, but I always make them give me an honest effort first.
Once I have a band able to match pitches fairly well I will teach them by ear basic scales (pentatonic, blues scale, or scale fragments) that can be used to improvise over a simple vamp. If they want or need to write down pitch names I will usually allow it, but they again have to give me an honest effort to learn these scales by ear before I’ll help them with the pitch names. Next I’ll teach the band some simple riffs that set up a vamp (again by ear) that fits those pitches.
As a composer I try to limit the number of independent lines I’m writing to no more than three or four (with some exceptions according to the effect I’m after). For the purposes of setting up a vamp for improvisation with a concert band I feel two or three riffs works best. Again, I teach my students the riffs by ear and have the whole band learn some basic riffs. After the band has got the gist of each riff I assign parts to them and get them to set up the vamp. Once the groove is happening, I’ll demonstrate by improvising a simple solo (using only the notes I taught them just before) over their accompaniment.

Since I’m a composer and experienced improviser, coming up with chord vamps and riffs isn’t really a big deal for me, but for many band directors this is a brick wall. In order to help those folks out, I’ve put together some riffs that you can use in PDF form here. Three of the examples are simple two-chord vamps with three simple riffs notated in all standard transpositions. One example is a blues progression in Eb with parts for each standard concert band instrument. Again, I usually teach students these riffs by ear and then later hand out parts if needed (or, better still, have the students learn to notate these riffs themselves).
Once you’re able to get your band riffing on this simple chord progressions you’re ready to get them to play solos. If you want to ease them into solo improvisation one way I like to get them started is to play a very simple (one or two note) idea with a metronome click and have them play the lick back at me. Use the a scale that will work over the vamp you want them to improvise over, but don’t use more than three notes (see the handouts from above for some scale choices over the vamps I wrote out). The point here is to teach them that they don’t need to play a very complex lick to sound tasteful. I emphasize that all they can play very interesting ideas by rhythmically improvising on even just one or two notes.
Then go around your ensemble and have everyone play 2, 4, or 8 measures of improvisation. Some students will jump right in and go wild while others will freeze up. With the eager students it can be helpful to get them to scale back their improvisation and not try to squeeze in every idea they have into just 4 measures. With timid students my goal is to get them to play just one note (then just one note more, now two notes, etc.). You can also have some students practice playing longer solos.
Another exercise I like to use is to have students come up with their own background riffs using only notes in the scale I’ve given them to improvise with. Each of the PDF examples I posted has three riffs, one that functions as a bass line, one chord support, and one melodic riff. Simply remove the melodic riff from the vamp and have a student play his or her own riff in place of it, then have the other students pick up that riff by ear.
You’ll notice that in almost every step of my process I emphasize teaching students ideas by ear. Having good aural skills is a critical ability for improvisation. While it’s certainly possible to create interesting improvisations from selecting note choices by reading notation this approach is limiting. Teaching your students to match pitches by ear will train them to “hear” the ideas they have in their head and play them more spontaneously.
Conversely, only teaching improvisation through playing by ear will also hinder development. I always like to point out that music theory IS ear training and vice versa. After you teach improvisational techniques by ear go back later and teach your students the theory behind it. More advanced concepts can be first learned via a theoretical approach (e.g., read this scale and then apply those notes over this chord vamp), but emphasize while practicing this way that your students should be listening closely to the sounds and making the connection between what they are seeing with what they are hearing. When using this approach reiterate to your students that they should intentionally leave a lot of silence in their improvisations to give them a chance to evaluate what they just played and then think a bit about what they are going to do next.
I recommend that you make improvisation a regular warmup with your group. You don’t have to improvise with them every day or even every week, but go back to improvisation every so often with them to reinforce what they’ve learned and get them to practice it more. Like most musical skills, improvisation abilities are developed over the long term and we can’t simply teach it in one class and expect that our students will become successful at it. In fact, you can break down all of the above steps and exercises into their own warmup and spread them out over the course of a week or so. Easing your students into improvisation this way will help some of your students who are more nervous about improvisation get used to the idea of playing a solo over time. All your students will benefit from the repetition of ear training and music theory over time, helping them retain these skills.
And of course, have fun with it. The more you project that you’re enjoying the music the more it will “jazz up” your concert band for learning to improvise. Even if many of these students will never join a jazz band you’ll find that the ear training and music theory practice they get will help them become better musicians and benefit your concert band in ways you didn’t expect.
Good luck! Let me know if you have any questions in the comments below.
Joe “Tricky Sam” Nanton’s Solo on East St. Louis Toodle-Oo
When performing with the Low-Down Sires, a traditional jazz group, we frequently decide (either collectively or individually) to perform the solos off of recordings rather than to improvise our own. We recently added Duke Ellington’s composition East St. Louis Toodle-Oo (Harlem Twist) to our repertoire and I really enjoyed the trombone solo on the recording. We all thought this would be a good one for me to play the recorded solo on, so I transcribed “Tricky Sam” Nanton’s solo from it.
It’s got a couple of interesting things on it. The opening lick is cool for the motive he played with a three note melodic idea superimposed over different parts of the first couple of measures.

Nanton also plays around with some chromatic passing tones on his solo break, specifically a passing tone between the 5th and 6th notes of the major scale and then the 2nd and 3rd notes. This chromatic passing tone usage would become pretty common with bebop musicians and sometimes is called a “bebop scale” today. For example, a major scale with the passing tone between the 5th and 6th notes is frequently called a “major bebop scale” and a major scale with a passing tone between the 6th and 7th notes is sometimes called the “dominant bebop scale.” Here is Nanton’s solo break.

It’s a short, but very tasty solo. Click here to download a PDF of the whole thing. As always, I recommend you at least double check my accuracy here and let me know if you spot any errors. It’s best to do your own transcribing, since you’ll learn the whole stylistic language (articulation, vibrato, swing feeling, etc.) as well as develop your own ear much better that way.
Tyson Tunes Up for Middle School/High School Jazz Ensemble
I recently completed yet another demo recording of one of my student jazz ensemble charts. Tyson Tunes Up was composed for the Owen Middle School Jazz Ensemble in Swannanoa, NC, directed by my friend Tyson Hamrick. This piece is a little more challenging than the other two student charts I’ve recently written, more suitable for an advanced middle school band or high school band.
This composition is a bright rhythm changes chart with quotes sprinkled in from other well-known tunes that use the same chord progression. Give it a listen and see how many of them you can catch.
As with my other two recent demo recordings, I created this sample using my home computer on the software GarageBand, with Justin Watt on the drums, Michael Gamble on bass, and Frank Southecorvo playing all the sax parts. I play all the brass parts and piano on this.
If you like how this chart sounds and want it for your student group it will be made available for purchase on PDF Jazz Music.
Nogueira Amarga for Middle School Jazz Ensemble

I’ve completed another demo recording of one of my big band compositions for middle school level jazz ensemble. I wrote Nogueira Amarga for the Northview Middle School in Hickory, NC under the direction of my friend David Wortman. The title is a pun on the name of the town they are in. I searched for a translation of “hickory” in Portuguese and it came up “norgueira amarga,” which literally translates (at least according to the software) as “bitter walnut.”
Here’s the audio sample. Like I did with an earlier piece, this one is recorded with me playing all the brass parts and the piano, Frank Southecorvo on saxophones, Michael Gamble on bass, and Justin Watt on drums. I want to thank Frank, Michael, and Justin for taking the time to help me get these recordings made and playing so well on them.
This chart will be published on PDF Jazz Music, so if you’re a middle school band director and want to get a copy of it check the above link and if it’s not available already it will be soon.
Learning Traditional Jazz Chord Progressions
Traditional jazz, like every musical genre, has its own set of patterns that help distinguish it from other styles of jazz. Getting into the chord changes of traditional jazz tunes shows that there are common patterns that a lot of this music starts with. Ivan, from Playing Traditional Jazz, identifies fifteen of them. Becoming familiar with these patterns will not only help you memorize tunes more easily but also help you improvise over these changes as you develop strategies for blowing over similar changes in the context of new tunes and different keys.
1. THE RED ROSES PATTERN
Definition: Tune begins on the tonic (usually two bars) and then moves on to the 7th (also two bars), meaning that in the Key of F the first chord would be F major and the next E major (or E7th).2. THE SALTY DOG PATTERN
Definition: The tune begins (usually two bars) on the chord of the 6th note in the scale (e.g., a tune in the key of G starting on the chord of E or E7th). This is normally followed by the chord on the 2nd note of the scale, and then on the 5th note of the scale, thus continuing the ‘circle of fifths’.3. THE GEORGIA PATTERN
Definition: The tune starts on the tonic, proceeding to the chord of the 3rd and then on to the 6th. So in the key of C, this would mean C major, followed by E7th and then A7th (sometimes A minor).4. THE SWEET SUE PATTERN
Definition: Begins on the Dominant 7th, with the Tonic as the next chord. (Often this pattern is then repeated before further developments.) To put it simply, if you’re in the key of C, you begin these tunes on G7th (usually two bars) and then move on to C.5. THE BYE BYE PATTERN
Definition: Begins on the tonic. This is followed by the 6th flat major, then tonic again, and then 6th. So in the key of C this would be: C – Ab – C – A.6. THE MAGNOLIA PATTERN
Definition: The tune starts on the Tonic, then moves to the Tonic 7th; then the chord of the 4th note in the scale; and then the 4th minor (or sometimes dininished). So, in the Key of C, this would mean: C : C7 : F : Fm .7. THE MY OLD MAN PATTERN
Definition: The tune starts on the Tonic chord and then follows this with the commonest chord progression of all – known to musicians as 2 – 5 – 1. So a tune beginning on the chord of C major, for example, would progress on to D major (the chord of the second note of the scale), followed by the chord of G7th (the dominant seventh – the fifth note of the scale) before returning to C major. A very satisfying 8-bar musical phrase can be built on two bars each of these four chords.8. THE DRAGON PATTERN
Definition: The tune starts on the chord of the Tonic and then follows this with the minor chord on the third note of the scale.9. THE SAINTS PATTERN
Notes: Everybody knows When the Saints. Its progression is instantly recognisable and fairly simple. But, as far as I know, it has not been widely used.
Definition: Starts with (what could be easier?) six bars on the Tonic chord. Then briefly the Dominant 7th. Then it uses the Magnolia progression (see above).10. THE APPLE TREE PATTERN
Definition: Start on the chord of the Tonic; then move on to the chord of the 4th note of the scale; and then back to the Tonic. So in the key of C, the first three chords would be C – F – C.11. THE LOVE MY BABY PATTERN
Definition: Begin with 4 bars on the Dominant 7th and then 4 bars on the sixth note of the scale. To put it simply, if you play the tune in the key of G, the first 4 bars will be on D7th and the next 4 on E7th.12. THE BILL BAILEY PATTERN
Definition: First six bars on the Tonic, next eight on the Dominant 7th. Next two on the Tonic. Start second sixteen on the Tonic, etc. End 4 – 4 minor – 1 – 6 seventh – 2 seventh – 5 seventh – 1 – 1. The tunes listed below do not all stick to it 100%, but they do so as nearly as makes little difference.13. THE TWELVE-BAR BLUES PATTERN
Definition: Twelve bars, essentially:
1 1 1 17th 4 4 1 1 57th 57th 1 1
Subtle variations within that pattern are encouraged.14. THE FINAL EIGHT PATTERN (also known as THE SUNSHINE CHORD PROGRESSION)
Definition: In the Key of C, the eight bars would be:
F major F minor C major A7 D7 (or D minor) G7 C major C major
In other words:
Chord on the 4th of the scale
Chord on the 4th Minor (or diminished)
Chord on the Tonic
Chord on the 6th seventh
Chord on the 2nd seventh
Chord on the 5th seventh
Major Chord on the Tonic
Major Chord on the Tonic15. THE MINOR PATTERN
Definition: Much of the tune (sometimes just the first part) is in a minor key.
For more information about these common chord changes, including extensive lists of tunes that use them, check out Traditional Jazz Chord Progressions. Special thanks to Mick, cornetist with the Low-Down Sires, for finding this excellent resource.
Blackhawk Blues for Middle School Jazz Ensemble
A bit over a year ago I composed Blackhawk Blues for the North Buncombe Middle School Jazz Ensemble, under the direction of Mary Jo Sparrow. Last week I finally got around to finishing a demo recording of it. I made this recording with my own equipment and with only four players. I’m performing all the brass parts and the piano. Frank Southecorvo played all the sax parts. The bass part is played by Michael Gamble and drums by Justin Watt. I’d like to thank Frank, Michael, and Justin for playing those parts for me.
This chart was accepted for publication, so as soon as all the loose ends are tied up you should be able to purchase it for your middle school or high school jazz ensemble through PDF Jazz Music.
Why Are Parallel Fifths Bad Voice Leading?
I recently posted a music theory puzzle of a Bach chorale excerpt which contains parallel fifths. I was reminded that some music students may not understand why parallel fifths are considered “bad.” In fact, a great deal of contemporary music uses parallel fifths and to our modern ears they don’t usually sound wrong.
The usual answer is that it “destroys the independence” of each voice, which is true. However, there are also some practical reasons for avoiding parallel fifths in compositions for a cappella voices – it’s hard to sing. ComposerOnline put together an nice video presentation that demonstrates this.
There are also some historical reasons why Baroque Era composers began consciously avoiding parallel fifths. Beginning around the 8th or 9th century polyphony (the idea of using multiple melodic lines together, rather than just unison voices or voices with drones) developed. The religious chants were sung in monasteries by both men and boys in octaves already, so it seems obvious in retrospect that they might also sing them in parallel fifths. This is known as “parallel organum.” David W. Barber describes organum in his book, “Bach, Beethoven, and the Boys: Music History As It Ought To Be Taught.”
Gregorian chants developed into something called organum, which was all the rage of the ninth to 12th centuries. In its simples form, this consisted of singing the same Gregorian tune as the monk beside you at the interval of a perfect fourth or fifth.* This is harder to do than it sounds, and requires the kind of concentration that monks are especially good at.
* Barber’s footnote reads, “It’s not worth explaining why fourths and fifths are called perfect. Just take my word for it.”
Parallel organum later evolved into “free organum,” although it still frequently used parallel fourths or fifths between the two voices. It’s quite a distinctive sound. Here’s an example.
By 1600 ( early Baroque Era) the sound of parallel motion had started to sound old fashioned. Even in instrumental music, which doesn’t have the technical difficulties writing for voices have with parallel motion, composers avoided the use of parallel fifths and octaves. When they were used, they were sometimes used to symbolize something rustic or old fashioned, such as in Beethoven’s 6th (“Pastoral Symphony”).
It’s not until the 20th century when composers began to start using parallel motion with more frequency. It’s now a sound that is ubiquitous in many styles of music. I find it interesting that a musical sound can go from 5 centuries of extensive use to 3 centuries of avoidance, to being used frequently again. Not to mention musical styles other than “western European art music” that use parallel motion all the time. Regardless of your stylistic interests, both the use and avoidance of parallel fifths is something that is worth learning about. The distinctive sound of parallel fifths still has an ability to elicit a powerful reaction on us.
Music Theory Puzzle – Spot the Parallel Fifths in Bach Chorale
It’s been a while since I put out a music theory puzzle. Here is an excerpt from a chorale by J.S. Bach, “Ach Gott, vom Himmel sieh darein” (“”Oh God, look down from heaven”). This particular chorale contains (*gasp*) parallel fifths. Take a look and see if you can spot them. The answer after the break.

Composer Russell Steinberg wrote about Bach’s use of unconventional techniques like parallel fifths.
The risky choices require much more imagination. They introduce elements of chaos and instability into the chorale that require other extreme choices to balance the whole. Not surprisingly, Bach does not choose to play it safe. Instead, he careens around the fringes of tonal coherence. His riskier choices require ever more imaginative responses in an intricate balancing act that erupts in surprise and a hypersensitive awareness of connections between the voices. Bach’s chorales expose possibilities within tonality that are not immediately obvious, all by pushing the system to its breaking point. If the conventional voice leading the textbooks advocate produces a dozen solutions, Bach’s unconventional tendencies expose hundreds of new choices. These choices bend the system and astonish the ear, but still work within the tonal framework, and ultimately support and strengthen its foundations. They revitalize the chorales with the excitement of discovering new possibilities and new beauty in tonality.
Did you spot the parallel fifths yet? Continue on to see the answer.
Continue reading “Music Theory Puzzle – Spot the Parallel Fifths in Bach Chorale”Happy Independence Day
Happy Independence Day for all the U.S. readers. Here’s video of an arrangement I wrote for the San Luis Valley Big Band performed by the Trinity Jazz Orchestra.
