
A few months ago I posted a criticism of Arnold Jacobs pedagogy, specifically related to his dismissal of embouchure as an important factor of brass playing. I recently got a comment on that article that has some very common misconceptions to my brass embouchure research. I wanted to take a moment and address some of those now, using this comment as a launching point for further discussion. I hope that my commenter, Kaj Fagerberg, doesn’t feel singled out here, as his points echo many made by Jacobs himself. Due in part to Jacobs’ pervasive influence, these misconceptions are widespread among brass players.
Kaj writes:
I think what Jacobs is saying is that the embouchure must vibrate, that’s all it does. There is not a magic setting that one must find, it just produces vibration to produce sound. Our teachers spend so much time trying to get us produce a perfect textbook example of the embouchure, that they forget it’s goal is to vibrate. Yes, a functioning embouchure vibrates, just as a distorted one can. There is no difference. That is the point he is making.
I think it’s a pretty simplistic view that all the embouchure does is merely vibrate. The lip vibrations must be controlled perfectly in order to play the correct pitch and with a focused and resonant tone. It’s true that a distorted embouchure vibrates too, as demonstrated by Jacobs’ infamous embouchure trick, but a distorted embouchure formation is inefficient and causes problems we want to avoid. Jacobs probably never actually performed with his lips twisted up like this because it would not be an optimal way to play and I think he’d probably help students avoid winding up the lips with the mouthpiece rim.
Continue reading “Arnold Jacobs On Embouchure: A Criticism, Part 2”

